I like your ideas but I'd like them to be more directly tied to a location. You can include the abstract elements within the location, but use more reference/ source material for the places and things. I'm also not sure how I feel about the faceless figures. It seems less like they have a graphic purpose and more like you're not comfortable drawing faces. Maybe if you consider the form of the entire model as sillouette it will work better. Rework them a little before monday.
i agree with daniel on all of those points. also, consider how the clothing is being worn by the figures a little more. right now it feels a little like the clothes and the figures are very seperate from one another, like it's a dress with legs arms and a head coming out of it, rather than it being WORN on somebody.
that grrl better wear that dress, cause if she don't, the dress'll wear hur!
3 comments:
Jane,
I like your ideas but I'd like them to be more directly tied to a location. You can include the abstract elements within the location, but use more reference/ source material for the places and things. I'm also not sure how I feel about the faceless figures. It seems less like they have a graphic purpose and more like you're not comfortable drawing faces. Maybe if you consider the form of the entire model as sillouette it will work better. Rework them a little before monday.
---->daniel
Also, I wanted to say that your top piece (the one with the trees) works best. I think you should consider framing all of them that way.
---->daniel
i agree with daniel on all of those points. also, consider how the clothing is being worn by the figures a little more. right now it feels a little like the clothes and the figures are very seperate from one another, like it's a dress with legs arms and a head coming out of it, rather than it being WORN on somebody.
that grrl better wear that dress, cause if she don't, the dress'll wear hur!
Post a Comment